Sugarsparkles: "I can only masturbate to this colour of man" is more or less what these petty, pathetic arguments always boil down to - not sure whether to laugh or feel sad for these people. On one hand, you have white racists who vote down every piece of black male on white female content but vote up every white male on black female piece of content - hypocrites in denial that feel threatened that their 2D waifus are unfaithful or some shit. On the other hand, you have black racist reactionaries who create accounts named things like "AryanTEARS" to advertise to everyone just how anally assaulted they are over this. Everyone - grow up, please, and, if you don't like something, fucking get over it and move on. Maybe try not clicking the nice, big thumbnail that shows you what the content is going to be? Just my two cents.
Greywolf: @Sugarsparkles: Let the truth low like a river, friend. And watch as /none/ of them are made better by getting over their egos and insecurities to just take a sip from it.
@Mercen: Truth. Let's not forget the numerous images that have /two/ versions where only the black version gets the brunt of their vitriol also.
Anonymous3: lol all these simps make me laugh. white male on black female doesn't bother them, but put black male on white female and watch how angry these cucks get.
A man who's secure about themselves wouldn't give a shit about the color of the guy who's fucking the woman. you focus on the woman and nothing else! Goes to show you that their real issue is with black dick. They see black dick and they start to feel insecure with themselves. Lmao what a bunch of little dick cucks!
Anonymous4: If you compare white male on black female content to black male on white female you'll see a HUGE difference in the amount of it available. I don't mind seeing blacks here and there, but lately this shit has been flooding the animated section. I can't fap to it and I usually leave it at that, but those who defend it are clearly ridden with some sort white guilt.
Anonymous5: ^ That is assuming: 1a. = the defender is white. 2b. = the defender suffers from "white guilt".
Both could be true but it could also be that 1a. is false, which kinda nulls 2b., or that 1a. is true, but that 2b. is false, in which case it's just a white guy who found some hot porn on the web (1a.2a. = he's cool with it). I think the angst comes from people who correspond to 1a. and 2c. (not "white guilt" but "white angst").
In comparison, the defender could be white (1a.) or (just for simplicity) nonwhite (1b.) in addition to any of 2a., 2b. or 2c.* - but the attacker is always 2c. if also 1a.
The overriding factor here that I failed to mention of course is M = male, which is what must take precedence before any number.
Anonymous6: The disparity between BMWW to BWWM is a question of supply and demand, but I get that you're saying the disparity can be jarring to anyone fine with both or just the less popular one. Most likely it affects the seeker of latter more.
Because the BM seems to be the cause of the controversy a fairer question would be how large is the difference in quantity of NonIR to IR porn? I'm not talking about fictional porn now, btw, because I think this reaction stems primarily from the IRL counterpart. Anyway, allowing for IR to be reffered to as it is most commonly defined on a typical porno site, that is: a BM with a woman of any other race, I would say that NonIR probably has more, since there are just so many more white porn actresses (dunno about the males) than of the other races. It seems reasonable to assume there would have accumulated more WMWW scenes overall, especially since the industry has only fairly recently become more relaxed with BMWW.
So I don't buy into that there is suddenly more IR content to the BM(X)W side of things, considering all the WMAW, WMLW (latin) and WMBW IR that oftentimes just go unlabeled, more often tags reflect the ethnic heritage of the woman whereas the man goes untagged. So there's a bit of an 'illusion of plenitude' going on here, and a big overreaction too.
Anonymous8: Addendum to my first post, just to clarify. You, Anonymous4, would fit into category 2b. You're alright with it, you don't like it but do not show animosity towards it, so, neutral or (cool with it) is apt. Well now! Actually, that might be another category altogether, thinking about it.. I'll dub it 2b.c., maybe. (not suggesting angst but just a negative preference.)
Comments
- Reply
HOWEVER
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Has the meme progressed /this/ far into absurdity already?
- Reply
- Reply
@Mercen: Truth. Let's not forget the numerous images that have /two/ versions where only the black version gets the brunt of their vitriol also.
A man who's secure about themselves wouldn't give a shit about the color of the guy who's fucking the woman. you focus on the woman and nothing else! Goes to show you that their real issue is with black dick. They see black dick and they start to feel insecure with themselves. Lmao what a bunch of little dick cucks!
Both could be true but it could also be that 1a. is false, which kinda nulls 2b., or that 1a. is true, but that 2b. is false, in which case it's just a white guy who found some hot porn on the web (1a.2a. = he's cool with it). I think the angst comes from people who correspond to 1a. and 2c. (not "white guilt" but "white angst").
In comparison, the defender could be white (1a.) or (just for simplicity) nonwhite (1b.) in addition to any of 2a., 2b. or 2c.* - but the attacker is always 2c. if also 1a.
The overriding factor here that I failed to mention of course is M = male, which is what must take precedence before any number.
(*the defender is trolling for more 2c.'s)
Because the BM seems to be the cause of the controversy a fairer question would be how large is the difference in quantity of NonIR to IR porn? I'm not talking about fictional porn now, btw, because I think this reaction stems primarily from the IRL counterpart. Anyway, allowing for IR to be reffered to as it is most commonly defined on a typical porno site, that is: a BM with a woman of any other race, I would say that NonIR probably has more, since there are just so many more white porn actresses (dunno about the males) than of the other races. It seems reasonable to assume there would have accumulated more WMWW scenes overall, especially since the industry has only fairly recently become more relaxed with BMWW.
So I don't buy into that there is suddenly more IR content to the BM(X)W side of things, considering all the WMAW, WMLW (latin) and WMBW IR that oftentimes just go unlabeled, more often tags reflect the ethnic heritage of the woman whereas the man goes untagged. So there's a bit of an 'illusion of plenitude' going on here, and a big overreaction too.