Anonymous2: You ta with a sensual woman.
The provision "under" ...
Ai instead of you having fun with the gang ...
You play the dogs ... FOW.
That video was shit that is less then have fun ...
They throw her Harley Quinn to dog okay, they put headboards to a dog that shit ...
Here in this video at least and bestial monster humanoide a short video ...
The purpose was better than the rsrsrsrsrs FOW ...
elbatmansfm: I'd rather watch this than the latest FOW release. I just can't get into their storylines, scripts and/or directing. Animations are epic. But everything else detracts from it for me. Normally Aardvark's facial expressions put me off, or tongues always hanging out. But this is sexy and funny
Anonymous5: I get it if you flat-out don't like bestiality and rape, but saying this is objectively better than an animation that had hundreds of hours put into it is an insult to FOW's animators.
The action is a half-second mechanical loop repeated for nearly a minute with stock voice clips and slapping sound effects. The camerawork is just above average. The lip syncing is poor but passable.
None of this makes it bad, but it's clear it was made by someone who doesn't have access to the resources to really make a stand-out animation.
Somebody please explain how you compare a loop and climax sequence to a multi-scene, 20min video with original voice acting, and still decide unbiasedly that this is the better of the two. They're on entirely different levels.
As someone who enjoys content from both creators, I implore you guys to just ignore one or the other if you don't like their stuff. Stop fueling this ridiculous fanboy war (which neither face really cares about) and continuously making the SFM porn crowd look worse by being whiny jerks.
Eh, who am I kidding. You probably decided my view was moot once I mentioned Studio FOW, didn't you?
Anonymous6: Yes!! No animals involved... I to this day dont understand why bestiality is still a thing. I get monster girls but this is most certainly not that. While FOW ainimation and quality was better, this one is more enjoyable for me simply because no animals were involved.
Greywolf: @Anonymous: Most sensible and respectable direct dissent offered. Stay classy, sir/madam. ^_^-b
Also, I agree. Beastiality is not one of my preferred kinks and I rather have my porn without it. But, hey. Patrons gonna patron.
@Illios: @Anonymous: /Signed for complete truth. Studio FOWs work is amazingly well done 90% of the time and, even if they showcase a kink I'm not into,
I can recognize the talent and time put in to create the work. And that's not to say that a vast majority of Aardvark's work is not stellar as well, mind you. Let's just keep things in perspective, ne?
Anonymous8: I see the aardvark-drones are out in force again..any retard can see he just shit this out quickly to try and compete with FOW but failed miserably
Comments
Careful, or FOW will say that you're Aardvark fanboy!
Bunch of sick fucks.
You sick fuck.
The provision "under" ...
Ai instead of you having fun with the gang ...
You play the dogs ... FOW.
That video was shit that is less then have fun ...
They throw her Harley Quinn to dog okay, they put headboards to a dog that shit ...
Here in this video at least and bestial monster humanoide a short video ...
The purpose was better than the rsrsrsrsrs FOW ...
- Reply
- Reply
@elbatmansfm: I hope you know I fucking HATE the tongues-hanging-out / "ahegao." I think it looks retarded as fuck.
But people keep paying for it.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
The action is a half-second mechanical loop repeated for nearly a minute with stock voice clips and slapping sound effects. The camerawork is just above average. The lip syncing is poor but passable.
None of this makes it bad, but it's clear it was made by someone who doesn't have access to the resources to really make a stand-out animation.
Somebody please explain how you compare a loop and climax sequence to a multi-scene, 20min video with original voice acting, and still decide unbiasedly that this is the better of the two. They're on entirely different levels.
As someone who enjoys content from both creators, I implore you guys to just ignore one or the other if you don't like their stuff. Stop fueling this ridiculous fanboy war (which neither face really cares about) and continuously making the SFM porn crowd look worse by being whiny jerks.
Eh, who am I kidding. You probably decided my view was moot once I mentioned Studio FOW, didn't you?
- Reply
- Reply
Also, I agree. Beastiality is not one of my preferred kinks and I rather have my porn without it. But, hey. Patrons gonna patron.
@Illios: @Anonymous: /Signed for complete truth. Studio FOWs work is amazingly well done 90% of the time and, even if they showcase a kink I'm not into,
I can recognize the talent and time put in to create the work. And that's not to say that a vast majority of Aardvark's work is not stellar as well, mind you. Let's just keep things in perspective, ne?
great productions
Are the best
Ta full of gaming, movies ... Triple-A
What are crap.