Shine: This is genius. And not just because it's self-aware of how 'weird' foot fetishes are, but it actually does the fetish right. If you like feet so much, why not lick'em and suck'em. All the idiots who only want to see feet touching a dick need to be shot.
Now if someone could make a similar video to this that's a footjob but have the girl actually stop and ask the guy "Why the fuck am I even doing this?" then that would be even more genius.
SumptiousRobo: Am I the one millionth customer? Echoing all the "zero interest in foot stuff but this is cute" comments, because I genuinely HATE feet and won't even touch them IRL unless my partner's into that (I'm not an asshole) because they're just these weird, flat, misshapen hands with all these vestigial digits, and you totally get the idea.
This though? Cute, good timing, and doesn't need a word of understandable dialogue for it to read. Like, fucking bravo!
FootmanJeff: I was going to dish out an insult to certain commenters, but I really don't like to be negative. Just going to say, footjobs and feet are better than everything else.
Shine: @syko136: Evolutionary wise, anyone more interested in a girl's feet than her sex organs, which are required to reproduce, really do deserve to be shot and purged from the gene pool. It can only help the human race survive longer. Less morons trying to fuck feet means less people doing it wrong. Because unlike anal, footjobs are so incredibly retarded they make handjobs look rational.
buru: Idk how weird feet are on a website with lil girls fucking dogs and horses, sometimes aliens. Actually feet are pretty damn tame and complaining about them in the comments is a cry for attention just like BBC posting.
Shine: @buru: Imagine buying a new Tesla and jerking off to the tires when the autopilot with all its bells and whistles is sitting over there giving you the disgusted girlfriend look. That's why foot fetishist are weird. Because they're more interested in a girl's feet than the rest of her body that was biologically made to entice you.
SumptiousRobo: @Shine: ... you know that humans aren't engineered, right? Plus, the majority of what we find physically appealing (aside from basic things like symmetry) is culturally derived, which is why huge swaths of the world DGAF about boobs, showing ankles used to be naughty, etc., etc., etc.
aryan826: also i mean you can like both. if you have been in a tesla 1000 times you get the gist, but if a new model comes out with some sick ass rims why not spend 1 day admiring them :P
Shine: @"which is why huge swaths of the world DGAF about boobs"
I don't know what world you live in where that's true, but in our world, the real one, people care so much about boobs they get censored every day. Which wouldn't be the case if nobody cared, but they do because boobs are universally seen as sex appeal, whereas feet are not. When was the last time feet ever got censored? Like, never, because nobody gives a damn about them but the freaks.
SumptiousRobo: @Shine: Using modern standards in media censorship practices, to apply to a subject that has existed longer than recorded history? Forget using western-centric standards of decency across the planet, you're applying 2020 standards to the whole of human existence (literally).
There are plenty of countries where boobs aren't censored on TV, and plenty of places where breasts are strictly seen as baby food factories. As I said before, showing feet wasn't considered decent for a long while. Men being topless used to be seen as inappropriate (why do you think old-timey swimsuits looked like that?) just like women wearing pants was scandalous at one point. Women shaving their legs as a beauty standard only came about last century because razor companies needed to make up for lost profit due to the draft and invented the concept.
Your fondness for boobs being culturally-derived rather than biologically doesn't diminish that attraction; I've got a culturally-based fondness for Halloween. But your insistence that going gaga for boobs is a universal constant in human sexuality is incorrect, on a totally objective level.
Shine: @SumptiousRobo: Boobs are just one example of human anatomy I used because you're the one who brought them up. And then saying humans weren't engineered, obviously that's not what I meant. Don't get me started on butts and why they attract people more than any other part of the body regardless of sexual orientation and culture. It's evolutionary biology and feet cause about as much mating to happen as knees and elbows.
Comments
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Baron Strap is a Genius!
More of this please!
It cannot not get anymore cute than this. x3
*fapfapfap*
Now if someone could make a similar video to this that's a footjob but have the girl actually stop and ask the guy "Why the fuck am I even doing this?" then that would be even more genius.
- Reply
This though? Cute, good timing, and doesn't need a word of understandable dialogue for it to read. Like, fucking bravo!
- Reply
- Reply
A convo about the importance of name meanings, started by a guy going by "Aryan"? What a site to be on, what a time to be alive :P
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
I don't know what world you live in where that's true, but in our world, the real one, people care so much about boobs they get censored every day. Which wouldn't be the case if nobody cared, but they do because boobs are universally seen as sex appeal, whereas feet are not. When was the last time feet ever got censored? Like, never, because nobody gives a damn about them but the freaks.
- Reply
There are plenty of countries where boobs aren't censored on TV, and plenty of places where breasts are strictly seen as baby food factories. As I said before, showing feet wasn't considered decent for a long while. Men being topless used to be seen as inappropriate (why do you think old-timey swimsuits looked like that?) just like women wearing pants was scandalous at one point. Women shaving their legs as a beauty standard only came about last century because razor companies needed to make up for lost profit due to the draft and invented the concept.
Your fondness for boobs being culturally-derived rather than biologically doesn't diminish that attraction; I've got a culturally-based fondness for Halloween. But your insistence that going gaga for boobs is a universal constant in human sexuality is incorrect, on a totally objective level.